A
Arantius
Full Member
Verified Member
7+ Year Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2015
- Messages
- 244
- Reaction score
- 163
- Today at 8:45 AM
- #1
So I want to check that I’m not being gaslit by the admin at one of the main hospitals I work at- they are saying nurses (not CRNAs) can do deep sedation for cases like D&Cs, radiology, etc.
This is mostly driven by the proceduralists not wanting to fit into the allotted times that the group is providing a CRNA (and not wanting to show up on time, but rather late… all the time). Also, not wanting to wait for a CRNA to be available when they want to do a case…
Last I checked and remember, any level of sedation deeper than moderate sedation is a MAC and requires an anesthesia provider… right?
Has something changed?
Members don't see this ad.
abolt18
Cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool
Verified Member
10+ Year Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 4,605
- Reaction score
- 5,376
- Today at 8:51 AM
- #2
Arantius said:
So I want to check that I’m not being gaslit by the admin at one of the main hospitals I work at- they are saying nurses (not CRNAs) can do deep sedation for cases like D&Cs, radiology, etc.
This is mostly driven by the proceduralists not wanting to fit into the allotted times that the group is providing a CRNA (and not wanting to show up on time, but rather late… all the time). Also, not wanting to wait for a CRNA to be available when they want to do a case…
Last I checked and remember, any level of sedation deeper than moderate sedation is a MAC and requires an anesthesia provider… right?
Has something changed?
MAC means nothing more than that the patient is being monitored by "anesthesia". It does NOT define level of sedation.
Sedation goes from light/mild, to moderate, to deep, to general anesthesia. Someone providing sedation needs to be qualified to handle "one deeper" than what they're supposed to be doing, meaning if the nurse is providing moderate sedation, (s)he needs to be able rescue a patient that accidentally drifts into the level of deep sedation. If someone is providing deep sedation, they need to be capable of handling a patient under general anesthesia to rescue them.
No, nurses are not qualified to be regularly and intentionally providing DEEP sedation.
abolt18
Cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool cool
Verified Member
10+ Year Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 4,605
- Reaction score
- 5,376
- Today at 8:57 AM
- #3
Practice Guidelines for Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists
Developed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists: Jeffrey B. Gross, M.D. (Chair), Farmington, CT; Peter L. Bailey, M.D., Rochester, NY; Richard T. Connis, Ph.D., Woodinville, WA; Charles J. Coté, M.D., Chicago, IL; Fred G...
pubs.asahq.org
"Because sedation is a continuum, it is not always possible to predict how an individual patient will respond. Hence, practitioners intending to produce a given level of sedation should be able to rescue patients whose level of sedation becomes deeper than initially intended. Individuals administering Moderate Sedation/Analgesia (Conscious Sedation) should be able to rescue patients who enter a state of Deep Sedation/Analgesia , while those administering Deep Sedation/Analgesia should be able to rescue patients who enter a state of general anesthesia."
"Minimal Sedation (Anxiolysis) = a drug-induced state during which patients respond normally to verbal commands. Although cognitive function and coordination may be impaired, ventilatory and cardiovascular functions are unaffected.
Moderate Sedation/Analgesia (Conscious Sedation) = a drug-induced depression of consciousness during which patients respond purposefully to verbal commands, either alone or accompanied by light tactile stimulation. No interventions are required to maintain a patent airway, and spontaneous ventilation is adequate. Cardiovascular function is usually maintained.
Deep Sedation/Analgesia = a drug-induced depression of consciousness during which patients cannot be easily aroused but respond purposefully following repeated or painful stimulation. The ability to independently maintain ventilatory function may be impaired. Patients may require assistance in maintaining a patent airway, and spontaneous ventilation may be inadequate. Cardiovascular function is usually maintained.
General Anesthesia = a drug-induced loss of consciousness during which patients are not arousable, even by painful stimulation. The ability to independently maintain ventilatory function is often impaired. Patients often require assistance in maintaining a patent airway, and positive pressure ventilation may be required because of depressed spontaneous ventilation or drug-induced depression of neuromuscular function. Cardiovascular function may be impaired."
Members don't see this ad :)
H
Hoya11
Senior Member
15+ Year Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2004
- Messages
- 1,489
- Reaction score
- 1,529
- Today at 9:31 AM
- #4
Arantius said:
So I want to check that I’m not being gaslit by the admin at one of the main hospitals I work at- they are saying nurses (not CRNAs) can do deep sedation for cases like D&Cs, radiology, etc.
This is mostly driven by the proceduralists not wanting to fit into the allotted times that the group is providing a CRNA (and not wanting to show up on time, but rather late… all the time). Also, not wanting to wait for a CRNA to be available when they want to do a case…
Last I checked and remember, any level of sedation deeper than moderate sedation is a MAC and requires an anesthesia provider… right?
Has something changed?
It means they are to give 10 of versed and 400 of fent
Dr. Rude
Full Member
2+ Year Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2022
- Messages
- 1,187
- Reaction score
- 5,359
- Today at 9:43 AM
- #5
Hoya11 said:
It means they are to give 10 of versed and 400 of fent
Yup. Maybe remimazolam crap. Make sure that you are clear that this is not a good idea AND that you will not take ANY oversight or ownership of this process in any way. They will try to rope you in medicolegally.
GassYous
Full Member
Verified Member
2+ Year Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2020
- Messages
- 4,157
- Reaction score
- 9,093
- Today at 10:56 AM
- #6
Why are they talking to you about it? They can do whatever they want. But they shouldn't expect you to be immediately available for the inevitable complications.
MTGas2B
Cloudy and 50
Verified Member
Navy
Physician
Faculty
15+ Year Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2004
- Messages
- 974
- Reaction score
- 126
- Today at 11:22 AM
- #7
What do the faculty sedation guidelines say about non-anesthesia sedation?
What do the med staff bylaws and privileging documents say about supervising sedation?
M
Maverikk
Full Member
Verified Member
10+ Year Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2013
- Messages
- 368
- Reaction score
- 288
- Today at 12:01 PM
- #8
This is a bylaws question. On the west coast one of the GI docs took the sedasys algorithm, trained nurses on it and it is being used at many hospitals as NAPS (nurse administered propofol sedation). It works...but only if the GI doc has good patient selection, it works at outpatient centers, the CRNAs were raging about this. Honestly healthy outpatient endo doesn't need MDs or CRNAs...but the GI doc has to be cognizant to pick the right patients. I've seen this done at tertiary care centers too with limited anesthesia availability. It was a mess, they'd 'consult' anesthesia when they're about to do a food impaction, COPDer on home o2 for nurse sedation. The endoscopist was a pure proceduralist, the patients were worked up by a GI NP/PA, most came in through the NAPs pathway unless true disaster. It's the implementation that matters
Last edited:
S
secretasianman
Glorified Enabler
Verified Member
Physician
15+ Year Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 765
- Reaction score
- 846
- Today at 12:26 PM
- #9
Why trust a crna to do the right thing, when you can trust a gi doc lol. What could possibly go wrong..
A
Arantius
Full Member
Verified Member
7+ Year Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2015
- Messages
- 244
- Reaction score
- 163
- 29 minutes ago
- #10
GassYous said:
Why are they talking to you about it? They can do whatever they want. But they shouldn't expect you to be immediately available for the inevitable complications.
They asked my thoughts because I guess I’m one of the more “approachable” docs. It’s 100% locums at that site so no leadership in anesthesia. I did say I will not be anywhere near this and they could pay me a consulting fee for any duties above clinical, like asking me to opine on this…. There’s a reason they can’t hire anyone full time
Show hidden low quality content
You must log in or register to reply here.